Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - jraju

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 91
26
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: what has happened to fix the spam , jpm
« on: April 02, 2022, 09:10:23 pm »
Hi, Jpm, have you seen my thread?
May I expect a reply to the effect atleast you to confirm that server.pg01.com server is connected with tweaking com or not
If that is not, then just think about the security issue of all the users incuding yours pass thro, this server
Expected a kind of reply from the admin.
Shane never fails to reply to my queries, when he was active in the forum

27
Sorry for late reply boggines. But this is home premium.  I want the ultimate x64 bit . Found it and thanks for the reply. What I need is slip streaming technique if one has only the windows ultimate basic. Any update needs service pack 1 as prerequisite.
I also think , that windows 7, will be used by so many lovers for a long time even though support to it by microsoft came to an end.

28
Hi, boggins, your link only shows , a separate service pack  file download link.

29
Feedback & Suggestions / what has happened to fix the spam , jpm
« on: March 24, 2022, 08:40:49 pm »
Please see the thread at
https://www.tweaking.com/forums/index.php/topic,6833.msg49339.html#msg49339
You said that you found the reason and fix would be available as soon.
But I still receive all your emails as spam.
Probably all will be receiving those in spam folder
I have sent the tracert to the server and if the server belongs to tweaking.com, let me be informed.
the tracert command gives below details
C:\Users\battulu>tracert server.pg01.com

Tracing route to server.pg01.com [147.135.1.18]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    50 ms    44 ms    40 ms  10.208.120.1
  3    41 ms    46 ms    43 ms  static.ill.218.248.106.194/24.bsnl.in [218.248.1
06.194]
  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6    81 ms    81 ms    82 ms  103.87.125.29
  7   181 ms   180 ms   181 ms  103.87.124.133
  8   181 ms   182 ms   181 ms  103.87.124.166
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 10   271 ms   271 ms   270 ms  fra-fr5-sbb1-nc5.de.eu [54.36.50.242]
 11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 12   271 ms   271 ms   271 ms  fra-fr5-sbb1-nc5.de.eu [54.36.50.242]
 13   281 ms   280 ms   281 ms  be101.sbg-g1-nc5.fr.eu [94.23.122.136]
 14   277 ms   276 ms   276 ms  par-th2-sbb1-nc5.fr.eu [54.36.50.226]
 15     *        *      281 ms  was-nva1-sbb1-8k.va.us [37.187.36.199]
 16   277 ms   310 ms   276 ms  vl1333.was1-vin1-g2-nc5.wa.us [178.32.135.155]
 17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 21   291 ms   278 ms   278 ms  server.pg01.com [147.135.1.18]

Trace complete.
hope to receive a reply from you, jpm

30
Hi,
Is there any easy way of just adding the service pack 1 windows 7 installation media usb.
I know that there exist some software to do that. But can I do it without any software like command prompt etc.
I tried windows update offline installer before 14.1.2020 when Msoft stopped support to win 7.
But it created problem for me, with some access denied error and updates error.
Probably, any update needs service pack 1, as a pre requisite , I suppose,
So, Is there any easy way of slipstreaming the service pack 1 only in the installation media.

31
Hi, Thanks, Boggins.
The above tracert is for the owner of the site , of how it travels from my pc.
Thanks for the command and also for the tip , that it automatically finds the volume to activate the command.
What is the sfc scan offboot.
Do we need to scan the computer offline.
I hear that for the first time .
I usually use sfc on running windows only.
For a troubleshoot query, one answer was given as change to c: from X: , I will try to send the link. This is when i search the google for bootmgr is missing error I had .
I will try this command from recovery mode .
Please tell me about sfc offboot dir
thanks for all the tips

32
Hi, the tracert command gives this result. This is for information
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\battulu>tracert server.pg01.com

Tracing route to server.pg01.com [147.135.1.18]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    50 ms    44 ms    40 ms  10.208.120.1
  3    41 ms    46 ms    43 ms  static.ill.218.248.106.194/24.bsnl.in [218.248.1
06.194]
  4     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6    81 ms    81 ms    82 ms  103.87.125.29
  7   181 ms   180 ms   181 ms  103.87.124.133
  8   181 ms   182 ms   181 ms  103.87.124.166
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 10   271 ms   271 ms   270 ms  fra-fr5-sbb1-nc5.de.eu [54.36.50.242]
 11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 12   271 ms   271 ms   271 ms  fra-fr5-sbb1-nc5.de.eu [54.36.50.242]
 13   281 ms   280 ms   281 ms  be101.sbg-g1-nc5.fr.eu [94.23.122.136]
 14   277 ms   276 ms   276 ms  par-th2-sbb1-nc5.fr.eu [54.36.50.226]
 15     *        *      281 ms  was-nva1-sbb1-8k.va.us [37.187.36.199]
 16   277 ms   310 ms   276 ms  vl1333.was1-vin1-g2-nc5.wa.us [178.32.135.155]
 17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 19     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 20     *        *        *     Request timed out.
 21   291 ms   278 ms   278 ms  server.pg01.com [147.135.1.18]

Trace complete.

C:\Users\battulu>^A

33
Running Startup Repair three times would normally reinstate Repair your computer into the F8 boot options.

Should I do three times from the installation dvd, and should not choose the System Restore is that the procedure. please tell.
Your quote: it is the MS design
Is that the X: access the Reserved Partition of c: drive, hidden, and do the correction in the hard drive . Please tell.
Because, some websites recommend to use this command from C: by going to the c: from X: in recovery mode.
Boggins, regarding the spam matter, I am receiving the emails not from the tweaking.com server , but from via server.pg01.com .
Is that server anyway belongs to Shane.  Then , it is ok,
But if I mark the reply as not spam, it goes to the inbox.
But the next mail is received in spam folder. That is the concern

34
Hi, Thanks boggin.
But let me know, how correction made in x: , corrects the mbr in my c: reserved partition.
Thanks for the reply.
Boggins, Stilll all your emails are only received in my spam folder.
Is there any improvement .
Lately I heard that tim would fix it in a day or two.
what has happened

35
Hi,
 When your boot process is corrupted, you are given suggestion like using fixmbr, rebuildbcd etc to correct the error. I know that it is startup repair options.
Microsoft also gives the fixmbr and rebuildbcd commands as a workaround this problem . Microsoft says to use the install media or pre installed startup repairs to use those commands.
When we boot via installation media and access the repair the computer and go to command prompt, the directory it shows, is x:\source , which means that we are using the files in the installation media. By evoking these commands, how the boot folder in the reserved drive would get corrected. Please tell.
Sometimes, there may arise situation, when F8 on boot does not lilst Repair this computer. If the option is not there, microsoft says this is because there is no pre installed start up repairs files installed in the system. How could it be . Is it not a windows install process automatically at the time of installation?
So, does it not suggest that if you get the repair option in the advanced boot menu, then you are invoking these commands, or the system gets the command from the windows reserved partition?
So, my query above,
please give a detailed reply 

36
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: November 20, 2021, 08:20:49 pm »
Hi, Jpm, please post after you find and fix the issue so that I could know what is the issue and how you fixed it.
Would you

37
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: November 17, 2021, 04:39:16 pm »
Hi, jpm, I chanced seeing the post after some days in spam only.
Thanks boggins , that the issue is being seen.
What you have posted above is the same, I got on every post from tweaking.com
I hope that jpm would see to it and fix it .
I do not  see anything wrong with gmail and contents.
all mails are being received in spam folder and it needs the attention of the admins.
Moreover, the jpm post never reached me.
It was noticed when I open today mail , which was in spam folder.
hope that something good happens

38
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: October 06, 2021, 05:49:04 pm »
Hi, boggins, he is not available on PM.
Anyhow, as a senior member, my content is this
Hi,
       If at all , I was able to learn something basics at computer and has some basic knowledge, it was because of you.
       You might have forgotten me once you shifted your residence earlier, but I do not.
       Heard from boggins, your find, that you are just recovering of covid-19.
       I heard that your health was so much affected.
       I pray God for your speedy health and recovery .
      Would love you to come to the forum, and offer unimaginable solutions, which helped me, when you were regular at this forum.
       I still remember you with your family member in your profile photo those days.
        thanks and I am jraju

39
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: October 06, 2021, 05:36:38 pm »
Hi, So sorry to hear that Shane is recovering from Covid.
I wish him speedy recovery.
My query is to the tim and jim, and they could have seen to that. Forum runs on able moderators like you and also by the admins.
Here jim and tim does not even care to acknowledge the fact that there is some problem in their website. This is curious and disturbing me as a user who has a serious doubt and a long time member.
Today, also I received your reply in spam folder.
They at least could have clarified about the via dns.
If possible, I will pm Shane on his health , if he is on the available list

40
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: October 05, 2021, 04:53:31 pm »
Hi, it seems that the Admins are not all interested in fixing the queries of the user.
Sorry to report, that this fourm is not that much user friendly as before excepting that  Boggins answering from other place

41
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 22, 2021, 05:07:43 am »
Hi, Praying for speedy recovery of Shane, my friend and computer guru, and founder of tweaking.com.
Hi, boggins, it is not about boggin login alone. Everybody will be getting emails in their spam folder.
tim and jim , could fix this .
Shane used to send to the websites, which reads his forum mails as spam.
Ok . will wait for any response

42
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 21, 2021, 11:22:08 pm »
Is shane aware that all the correspondence between members would be shown in spam folder ?
Especially new members would find it , to open the spam message or simply delete it.
Being a member of this forum, I know that this is not spamming website.
But  there is little that could be done at user level to address to the required authority , to do not classiy their sites as spamming sites.
if this could be done, please say, and I will do as a member of this forum.
But the gmail authorities may expect it from the site owners instead.
If i remember correct, that Boggins you are in England, and coming to the forum to give solutions to the vexed problems faced by users.
This action is purely on admins part and I still hope that Shane would find time to address this. The replies from this forum are only shown in spam folder of gmail

43
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 18, 2021, 07:58:39 pm »
Hi, still I am not sure about the fact that why all the emails have been received in spam folder.
There is a little bit of difference in the path I did notice between the two gateways.
But the IP of both the servers show as the same IP, here I am getting confused.
Each ip is a unique ip , is it not.
I can make it as not spam by choosing the relevant tab to get it back to my inbox.
But still, each subsequent emails are only received through the spam folder .
If the admins are not replying , then there is no way and let this thread be in pause mode

44
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 18, 2021, 12:51:31 am »
I have done the tracert command for server.pg01.com as well, the result of which is given here

  1 10.208.120.1 20ms 10ms 10ms
2
4 * * * *
5 115.110.161.209 20ms 30ms 20ms
6 172.31.155.105 50ms 50ms 50ms
7 180.87.39.25 290ms 260ms 270ms
8 180.87.38.1 * * 270ms
9 80.231.217.29 270ms * *
10 * * * *
11 80.231.153.49 270ms 270ms 280ms
12 4.68.62.253 260ms 250ms 250ms
13 4.69.140.30 * * 250ms
14 * * * *
15 * * * *
16 * * * *
17 * * * *
18 37.187.36.199 260ms * *
19 178.32.135.155 * 250ms 250ms
20 * * * *
21 * * * *
22 * * * *
23 * * * *
24 147.135.1.18 260ms * *

I did notice that both goes thro the same path and the ip of both the servers are the same.
I think, Shane has renamed his tweaking.com server as name server , named server.pg01.com
I also think that this information has not been given to gmail, mostly used, which is making it as spam, as the tweaking.com is not found in their server and it shows the name server as via server resultilng in all the spam alerts .
This may be well known to Shane, and he could have atleast inform boggins or replied to me.
As I was getting all the mails in the spam, I raised this issue.
Why Shane as a founder could not just advised the admins to reply back to members.
Why admins just neglect the members post.
this forum is for founded for users solution by Shanes
If somebody says how to make not as spam, i would be glad to know

45
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 16, 2021, 08:51:56 pm »
My traceroute only shows this
there is no server.pg01.com , i think so in my tracert
please see
Ping Result
Traceroute 147.135.1.18:
trace route to tweaking.com (147.135.1.18), 30 hop max, 38 byte packets


  1 10.208.120.1 250ms 210ms 230ms
2
4 * * * *
5 115.110.161.209 300ms 310ms 280ms
6 172.31.155.105 260ms 360ms 360ms
7 180.87.39.25 520ms 410ms 540ms
8 * * * *
9 80.231.217.29 560ms 500ms 540ms
10 80.231.217.6 450ms 530ms *
11 80.231.153.49 500ms 500ms 540ms
12 4.68.62.253 490ms 440ms 530ms
13 * * * *
14 * * * *
15 * * * *
16 * * * *
17 * * * *
18 * * * *
19 178.32.135.155 * * 560ms
20 * * * *
21 * * * *
22 * * * *
23 * * * *
24 147.135.1.18 550ms * *

trace route finished

46
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 12, 2021, 08:40:53 pm »
Hi, Boggins. As a forum member, i could only highlight certain issues. It is for the founder or admins to look in to these and correct for the sake of forum sake.

I only see your postings from the admin side .
Ok let us wait for the reply

47
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 11, 2021, 11:24:06 pm »
hI, boggins , have you informed the founder?

48
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 11, 2021, 08:44:59 am »
Mo reply from jim.please inform them tweaking mails are routed thro some unidentified website.
Are they not seeing the concern

49
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 04, 2021, 11:43:33 pm »
Hi, Boggins . I have addressed jim to this thread link

50
Feedback & Suggestions / Re: for kind attention of the admins tim and jim
« on: September 03, 2021, 07:31:14 pm »
Hi, boggin ,
 As the founder of the forum and software, I request Shane to look in to this vexed problem.
I hope that he will look in to this and say something on this.
When he was active in this forum, I daily visit and he used to reply to every query in all the subforums. Now you are giving nice and valuable replies to queries on this forum.
Shane, would have introduced admins extra to this fourm.
But I did not receive any answers from them in this regard so far.
You have conveyed the messages to them and Shane.
Hope that it receives the attention of Shane :cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 91