Guys, I just found out something which might pose more problems with the partitions.
In my desktop pc I have a 128 Gb SSD and a 2 Tb internal HD. The pc shop had made the partitions C:, D: and E:. You know, the dynamic discs. BTW, I spoke to the head of the tech dept. and he admitted there must have been made a mistake during installation. He said: "just change them back to standard discs, it's easy". Okay, the words "just" and "easy" I would not use....
![confused :confused:](http://www.tweaking.com/forums/Smileys/smillhey/confused.png)
Two things (in my Obama voice which sounds
nothing like him):
![cheesy :cheesy:](http://www.tweaking.com/forums/Smileys/smillhey/cheesy.png)
Recently I changed the volumes of the partitions around. I needed some more space on D: and E: and took that off of C:. I don't remember its volume before I decreased it. Still left quite enough on C: (capacity now 111 Gb, unused 46 Gb). Then somebody told me to not defragment C: as it was the SSD. I use Wise Disk Cleaner and have done the defragmentation of C:, D:, E:, F: and G, the last two being my two external HDs. Yesterday I downloaded O&O Defrag and that did give a warning message to not defrag C: as it was the SSD.
Question 1: did I make a mistake by defragmenting C: with Wise Disk Cleaner?
Question 2: isn't it true that it's impossible to move flash memory to D: and E: on the HD, as that is a different type of memory? So
where did that go? And shouldn't I change it back to its original size of 128 Gb and stay clear of this whole SSD?
But......it gets even better (or worse): I don't remember the exact volumes before I changed them. But the weird thing is that I added at least 200 Gb to E: for my music files as E: tended to get filled up. The same with D:. I didn't just add a couple of Gbs to it, also more like 100 Gb. I do remember a large overcapacity of C:. And from 128 (SSD size) tot 111 Gb is only 17 Gb. That would mean that C: wasn't just comprised of the SSD alone but of HD memory too. Is that possible and normal?
Even weirder, but maybe an ignorant observation on my part: if you look at what data Speccy gives under Storage, the Kingston SSD: "speed: not used". To me that doesn't sound good, but maybe this is perfectly fine. Is it?
Speccy mentions the disk letters C: and F: and G: but not D: and E:. Is that normal?
http://speccy.piriform.com/results/ozuNekRLhA5gqgBTV1w61d1These Speccy things might not be a problem at all. My main concern is the defragmentation and decreasing of volume of C: that I did and its possible impact on the SSD.